The final strand that we focused on in our Language and
Literacy class was Oral Communication. The Ontario Curriculum states that
within the four strands of the curriculum, the strands are closely interrelated
and that the knowledge and skills described in the four strands co-exist. I consider
this to really explain the nature behind the strand of oral communication, because
the skills within oral communication are fundamental to literacy but also
thinking and learning. Through communication with other students, learners can facilitate more understanding about certain topics. Oral Communication
is fundamental for students to show their skills in regards to the Achievement
Chart, especially when it comes to Knowledge and Understanding, Communication and Application. The Ontario Curriculum Documents also argue that although students often
tend to develop oral language skills before they read and write, the development
of reading and writing skills is directly connected to how effective students
are when it comes to oral communication.
Just
like reading, writing and media literacy, students develop oral communication
skills by having teachers who provide them with numerous opportunities to develop their skills. Oral
communication is not just about communication between two students, it allows
them to facilitate and partake in classroom conversations, perform skits and
plays and allows them to realize that what they say and how they say it has
just as much influence on the message they are trying to send. One of the best
ways to facilitate he creation of good oral communication skills is through
in-class debates. Debates allow students to not only work on their oral communication
skills, but requires them to gather information and form arguments based on
factual evidence which highlights their ability in regards to their reading and
writing skills.
| Some students using oral communication during a reading exercise. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2gDndbB |
Although
the main ideas behind debates in the classroom appear to have the ability to be
a great way to work on oral communication and other language skills in class,
they do have their drawbacks. In her blog post entitled “Weaving Debate into
the Writing Process”, Ashley Prophet highlights the key issues educators and
students have with debates in the classroom. Through quick surveys, she found
that teachers who do not consider debates as a positive in the classroom was mostly
because they felt students get too rowdy, are often unprepared and they do not
know how to incorporate debates into the curriculum. She combats these notions by “rethinking”
classroom debates, and it revolves around much more preparation then is
normally done. She insists that
structuring the while activity into 5 separate stages can result in students
not only working on their oral communication at the end of it all, but work on
their reading and writing skills throughout the process. The first stage is
what she calls “Pre-writing” which allows students to organize their side of a
debate in a visual way like discussion webs or mind maps. The next two stages, entitled
“drafting” and “revising” incorporate more
writing and peer-editing strategies that allow students to formulate their main
arguments but also lets them start to think about what the other side will be
arguing about. Stage 4 is the actual debate, but it is only done after the last
two stages have been cleared by the instructor. The final stage is the “publishing”
stage, which incorporates consolidation of the exercise and asks students to
create a product at the end that highlights the main findings and results. This
process highlights the fact that the overall main aspect of debates is not the
debate itself, but how the students are able to use their other skills of
language and literacy to formulate their side of the argument.
The main purpose of the strand of
oral communication is to have students develop the skills and strategies to
become effective communicators, but also effective listeners. The strand of
oral communication does not stand alone, just like the others, it is best done
in conjunction with the other strands. Teachers who focus on oral communication through out their units allow students to ask and
answer more complicated questions and are able to stimulate students engagement
in their own learning.



